-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5c6gruZIWA just look at it mag dumping into nothing
Most of the Game reports dont even add up
https://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/1227724546811772544/799144526/
https://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/1227853940906305152/799144526/
check out all this games http://bf4cheatreport.com/?pid=799144526&uid=&cnt=200
-
There is no aimbot use in that video either. I understand that you believe he is cheating but your conviction to that belief is causing you to not be objective. I have no bias here and more experience with game mechanics and identifying cheaters. I know what aimbots look like in spectator videos, statistics, 1st person recorded videos. None of these videos you have provided, none of the videos he has recorded and posted, none of the rounds hes played show sufficient evidence for us to issue a ban.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLdtTJJBCDw&t=3s THIS IS THE VIDEO he renamed it
Like i said bearly going positive with a friend https://gyazo.com/02941918809785394ef11e5cdfbb3cd8
then going https://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/1227836056578637312/799144526/
also 72 headshots in that match
https://gyazo.com/283f5cb237be7771adec21f2206b583f with a nearly 7KPM
https://gyazo.com/d3edf7fc27db1d04b62a8a533f2a8bfe also banned form the server never went back on it again after this match
To this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blPYLw3D0wg&t=19s
https://gyazo.com/5fcfc6e1fbb0e5c501259b6b4cd2f62c his first games with mostly negitve to some positve games
https://gyazo.com/85d65207a8f88cd53ad20537e1459f4c then this super High KPM and low kpms to not to be obvious
https://gyazo.com/05cc9845150cffe4b1613da3daeb3402 this is where he started ot cheat becuase from 1kpm to 2 kpm then 5 and 6 and 7 kpms
The round where he had 79 headshots was also a round he had 249 kills in a 1 hour 30 minute round of Locker. He had a 29% hskr which is just barely above the hskr he was achieving when he was going negative. You aren't looking at context. You see 79 headshots and yell cheater.You want to believe hes cheating so literally any flick, or successful tracking, or fast reaction time, or correct pre-aim around a corner at an enemy you will attribute to cheat use. I think this is due to the fact that you have not progressed in skill and ability over the course of this game and therefore assume that is normal.Are you serious here? Good job cutting off the dates on the left. There was 20 months between those times.Regarding the gun damage you keep bringing up he played on hardcore servers. Due to the way gun damage is calculated as a hit to kill rate, on hardcore you need less hits to kill and therefore the hit to kill rate changes. All hardcore game mode players have elevated gun damage due to the nature of hardcore. -
@Zeuqhll It is easier for him to be banned by punkbuster, than to be banned by BF4DB.
-
True. We require sufficient evidence of proof. PB just bans randomly@Zeuqhll It is easier for him to be banned by punkbuster, than to be banned by BF4DB.
-
the dates
https://gyazo.com/7da5def510c15872a1baa294ae8da95b
https://gyazo.com/7e49f11ba0efa602c22617b821fdaa1f
so youre telling me
from doing this https://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/990614960899859648/799144526/ After a year of inactivity then coming back
doing pretty much the same with little imporvement https://gyazo.com/ed4343623497dc0a0de2ef24ae4a5e03 then out of the blue doign these silly numbes https://gyazo.com/a88e18c3be32bceb71f455bfb299ff1b
https://gyazo.com/66ded5d63f854c07078bcb0d9d9ea6a6
-
@Zeuqhll It is easier for him to be banned by punkbuster, than to be banned by BF4DB.
at this rate yeah the numbers speaks for its self
-
the dates
https://gyazo.com/7da5def510c15872a1baa294ae8da95b
https://gyazo.com/7e49f11ba0efa602c22617b821fdaa1f
so youre telling me
from doing this https://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/battlereport/show/1/990614960899859648/799144526/ After a year of inactivity then coming back
doing pretty much the same with little imporvement https://gyazo.com/ed4343623497dc0a0de2ef24ae4a5e03 then out of the blue doign these silly numbes https://gyazo.com/a88e18c3be32bceb71f455bfb299ff1b
https://gyazo.com/66ded5d63f854c07078bcb0d9d9ea6a6
Why would you assume hes inactive before playing on those dates? Its very possible that for the previous 20 months he was playing other fps games and improving in his mechanical skill. When he came back to bf4 he had to adjust to the maps, map flow, number of players in a game. Something he has not had to contend with in other games. Yes I think it is very possible that once he adjusted to the uniqueness that is battlefield, he is naturally capable of his current gameplay performance.
We do not ban players for getting good
There is not enough evidence in the videos to issue a ban or suspect there is cheat use
-
True. We require sufficient evidence of proof. PB just bans randomly@Zeuqhll It is easier for him to be banned by punkbuster, than to be banned by BF4DB.
Lie, the PB does not randomly ban them they are able to take screenshot of the game screen and use it as evidence. If they randomly banned major game companies they would not hire to be their anti cheat, games like battlefield, Call of Duty, Americas Army, Crysis, Medal of Honor, Rainbow six vegas, WarZ and several others use PB.
-
its funny because i really dont care about apex or CSGO or whatever games they play there not the same to bf4 ive seen people who are great at other games but come to bf4 and the cant cope with the skill gap. 0 skill players.... Time played does not equal skills attained.
if you need more proof i dount youll get any probably doenst even play the game anymore last game was a week ago if he does ill expose the kid for what he uses simple the last thing i want to record the absolute BOT then nothing happen...
ive got better thing to be doing than going round in circles
high skill players just simply dont appear out of thin air.. Like i said theres no consistency on his reports if he was getting better you'd see a small increase over a long time not the very short amount of time its taken this fool
-
Just because they were used in the past doesn't make them a viable anticheat anymore. We have sufficient proof that they issue massive amounts of false bans and that guid's have been spoofed in the past in BF4 resulting in malicious false bans.
Heres an article about how pb works and how cheaters managed to trigger large numbers of false positives https://web.archive.org/web/20160618090959/http://bashandslash.com/index.php?Itemid=78&id=297&option=com_content&task=view
EA stopped using PB in any of its games after hardline.
COD stopped using PB IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GAMES LIFECYCLE because of its inadequacy as an AC and due to rampant guid spoofing, false bans.
https://bf4db.com/forum/thread/punkbuster-bans-permanently-suspended-2777
-
Just because they were used in the past doesn't make them a viable anticheat anymore. We have sufficient proof that they issue massive amounts of false bans and that guid's have been spoofed in the past in BF4 resulting in malicious false bans.
Heres an article about how pb works and how cheaters managed to trigger large numbers of false positives https://web.archive.org/web/20160618090959/http://bashandslash.com/index.php?Itemid=78&id=297&option=com_content&task=view
EA stopped using PB in any of its games after hardline.
COD stopped using PB IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GAMES LIFECYCLE because of its inadequacy as an AC and due to rampant guid spoofing, false bans.
https://bf4db.com/forum/thread/punkbuster-bans-permanently-suspended-2777
Battlefields ANTICHEAT is about as good as BF5 a joke, they were suppose to bring a new one out last year acording to AKA arts video from A while back and yet 2020 here we are
-
Why do you think no new titles use Punkbuster?
Also using WarZ as an example is a meme in itself.
We still enforce Violations issued before a certain date, as detailed in a post on our Forums. In the past they were effective. But those days are behind us. We have undeniable proof they ban for no reason. They know it too, which is why they’ve stopped responding to appeals on their site in anything other than an automated response.
-
too right becuase PunkBuster is useless its rare anyone would of been banned by it for a expampe just look at the ban list 3211 pages of bansWhy do you think no new titles use Punkbuster?
Also using WarZ as an example is a meme in itself.
We still enforce Violations issued before a certain date, as detailed in a post on our Forums. In the past they were effective. But those days are behind us. We have undeniable proof they ban for no reason. They know it too, which is why they’ve stopped responding to appeals on their site in anything other than an automated response.
-
I just gave some examples of gamesWhy do you think no new titles use Punkbuster?
Also using WarZ as an example is a meme in itself.
We still enforce Violations issued before a certain date, as detailed in a post on our Forums. In the past they were effective. But those days are behind us. We have undeniable proof they ban for no reason. They know it too, which is why they’ve stopped responding to appeals on their site in anything other than an automated response.
-
i have reviewed a number of these videos just now. and to be perfectly honest it just looks like your average high sensitivity player. spectator videos do not show any kind of hard aimlock. its very human movements. from what i could tell throught the crappy bitrate on a few of the videos. it doesnt look like nospread or no recoil hacks are used. i dont see the why you peeps are so bent on he is using aimbot. its very clearly not.
| 4 years ago
